Tag Archives: small
Reciprocal link sharing does not work
That might sound a bit dramatic but no, it does not. I’ve been doing some research (during the early hours of the morning) and I’m amazed at the number of websites out there adopting the most insane techniques in order to climb SERPs.
I must admit, I was intrigued by the methods at first. I mean, who wouldn’t like to get a week’s work done in a few minutes? 🙂 But you know what they say, “if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is”.
The biggest monster of all is the promise of instantaneous link share with thousands of quality websites. This basically involves joining a poorly code shabby directory which is copied many times over thousands of different domains. There’s several things wrong with that:
1. These pages offer no quality content what-so-ever, so they’ll never be highly regarded by SEs.
2. The number of outgoing links on each page means your site will get a minuscule tiny small fraction of absolute nothing – it really isn’t much…
3. The same pages are duplicated over and over again around the web and are promptly ignored and penalized by SEs.
Now, if you’re a SEO expert you will know that apart from being a gross waste of time, it’s extremely unlikely that any of the above will harm your site’s reputation. A webmaster has no control over external links to his website(s), and for that reason his website(s) will not be penalized by the SEs, contrary to popular belief. In fact, these techniques may well fool small search engines* and quickly push a website up the ladder on SERPs.
Having said that, here’s the big whopper….
4. The most common requirement for these link-share wonders is that, of course, you place yet another copy of the directory and its thousands of badly coded content-less pages under your website.
This is a huge problem and is where many people go wrong. And here’s why:
* Adding thousands of pages to your website overnight will dramatically affect your content’s keyword density. SEs like Google don’t only examine an individual page, they also analyse the website as a whole in order to determine its ‘theme’.
* Whereas incoming links cannot harm your websites(s) reputation, outgoing links can destroy it – very quickly. A link to a page is seen seen as a ‘vote of confidence’ to that page and its content from the website linking into it. Linking into bad neighbourhoods and low quality websites will damage your reputation – (ie.: SERPs rankings).
This all sounds very depressing… so what can you do?
The most effect form of link sharing is and will always be one-way incoming links. And the best way to get that is by having quality content. And the best quality content should be found on your website.
Although traditional methods can be time consuming, you simply cannot go wrong. One week of quality content publishing is worth a million times more than every automatic FFA link directory that has ever existed ever.
* Small search engines – Anything other than Google, Yahoo, MSN and the likes…
Reciprocal link sharing does not work
That might sound a bit dramatic but no, it does not. I’ve been doing some research (during the early hours of the morning) and I’m amazed at the number of websites out there adopting the most insane techniques in order to climb SERPs.
I must admit, I was intrigued by the methods at first. I mean, who wouldn’t like to get a week’s work done in a few minutes? 🙂 But you know what they say, “if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is”.
The biggest monster of all is the promise of instantaneous link share with thousands of quality websites. This basically involves joining a poorly code shabby directory which is copied many times over thousands of different domains. There’s several things wrong with that:
1. These pages offer no quality content what-so-ever, so they’ll never be highly regarded by SEs.
2. The number of outgoing links on each page means your site will get a minuscule tiny small fraction of absolute nothing – it really isn’t much…
3. The same pages are duplicated over and over again around the web and are promptly ignored and penalized by SEs.
Now, if you’re a SEO expert you will know that apart from being a gross waste of time, it’s extremely unlikely that any of the above will harm your site’s reputation. A webmaster has no control over external links to his website(s), and for that reason his website(s) will not be penalized by the SEs, contrary to popular belief. In fact, these techniques may well fool small search engines* and quickly push a website up the ladder on SERPs.
Having said that, here’s the big whopper….
4. The most common requirement for these link-share wonders is that, of course, you place yet another copy of the directory and its thousands of badly coded content-less pages under your website.
This is a huge problem and is where many people go wrong. And here’s why:
* Adding thousands of pages to your website overnight will dramatically affect your content’s keyword density. SEs like Google don’t only examine an individual page, they also analyse the website as a whole in order to determine its ‘theme’.
* Whereas incoming links cannot harm your websites(s) reputation, outgoing links can destroy it – very quickly. A link to a page is seen seen as a ‘vote of confidence’ to that page and its content from the website linking into it. Linking into bad neighbourhoods and low quality websites will damage your reputation – (ie.: SERPs rankings).
This all sounds very depressing… so what can you do?
The most effect form of link sharing is and will always be one-way incoming links. And the best way to get that is by having quality content. And the best quality content should be found on your website.
Although traditional methods can be time consuming, you simply cannot go wrong. One week of quality content publishing is worth a million times more than every automatic FFA link directory that has ever existed ever.
* Small search engines – Anything other than Google, Yahoo, MSN and the likes…
Tips on How to Replace or Exchange a Broken Laptop Screen
Often a laptop operator will know immediately if the display has been damaged as the laptop display will be either wholly useless or spoiled by cracks, marks, coloration changes or perhaps no image at all.
A display may cost between a quarter and half the value of your laptop so you need to be sure that the screen has broken down before replacing it. If there is a crack or cracks, commonly oozing what looks like ink then you can certainly be sure that the display screen requires exchanging. On the other hand, a failed screen often appears undamaged but might have failed electrically. These defects are definitely more tough to spot and may often only be identified by changing the display screen.
Prior to you buying a replacement screen, find out the precise model and make number of the broken display. You could be able to do this by searching on the laptop makes internet page or if you take the broken screen out of the top the model number might be shown somewhere on the reverse of the faulty screen. Choosing the specific screen is very important as the incorrect match will probably end in you laptop demonstrating the wrong image resolution and loss of picture quality.
The typical laptop user will be able to remove a broken display without too much difficulty. You will need a set of small cross point screw drivers and a tiny flat point. Locate and take off the screw covers around the display bezel. You need to cautiously utilize the flat blade screwdriver for this. Take out all the tiny anchoring screws by using a small cross point screw driver. Check again that each have been removed. Gently ease the bezel from the lid; use tips of the fingers instead of a screwdriver etc, as you don’t want to scratch the plastic. Sometimes the bezel is glued to the display screen so gentle constant force may be needed to get rid of it. Fortunately, it does not matter if you additionally damage the screen while doing this operation. Try not to lose the screws or screw covers, as you will require them for display replacement.
Once the frame has been taken away you can detach the display screen from the hinges, there is generally several small centre point screws. You can at this point take off the data connection from the display, use caution though as there is often a section of gluey tape keeping it in position. You must pull the connector, not the lead, working with finger pressure. In the event you break the connection or yank, one of the cables out of it then the full wire will then require changing. For modern-day screens, this concludes the removal, however the older displays having a cold cathode fluorescent bulb use a further connector to eliminate from the inverter. That easily pulls away.
It shouldn’t be a challenge to add the brand new display screen. The most likely error could be to apply excessive pressure in reinserting the display screen cable or forcing the frame in position. If you utilize extreme pressure when adding the frame the display probably will crack or gain strange shadow effects. While screwing the frame into position be careful not to slide with the screwdriver and marking the display screen.
So long as you take some time, have the appropriate tools, have purchased exactly the right display, then this task ought to be effortlessly completed by the typical user.